In this context the system for designating companies

Therefore, any possible difference in treatment must be objectively justified.” The CJEU adds that if a Member State chooses to impose the financing obligation only on some companies in the sector "... it is up to the court ... to verify whether the differentiation made between the companies that must bear the weight of said burden and those that are exempt from she is objectively justified.” The Supreme Court analyzes the reasons used by the national legislator to place this burden on the electricity marketing companies , to the exclusion of other companies that operate in the electricity sector (generators, transporters, distributors), reaching the conclusion that the system of financing .



Designed is contrary to article 3. 2 of Directive 2009/72/EC because it lacks an objective justification and is discriminatory for the companies that assume the cost, to which the costs paid in application of the Phone Number Data canceled system will be refunded. The Supreme Court's ruling does not affect the application of the social bonus discount on the bills of certain vulnerable consumers, but declares the established financing mechanism inapplicable.The collaboration agreement will be valid for four years, extendable , and its application will be reviewed by a Joint Monitoring Commission that will meet for this purpose at least once a year.







applicable in accordance with the reference price index system. Tax incentives are established to reduce rental prices and increase affordable supply The Personal Income Tax is reformed to stimulate the rental of primary residences at affordable prices, modulating the current reduction in the net return on rentals of primary residences. Thus, from the current 60%, in the new lease contracts the percentage reduction will be 50% . Of course, this last percentage may increase to 90% , in the event that our leases are signed in the repeatedly stressed market areas .